Collaborative Divorce

Why trust and divorce can go hand in handtraditional divorce process, are finding success with
The emerging field of collaborative law is viewed withcollaborative law. In order to understand how
equal parts hope and skepticism. On one hand, courts,collaborative divorce works, it is important to
lawyers and divorcing couples, especially those withunderstand the concept of process trust.
children, have struggled to find a way to make divorceThere is a difference between trust between the
less bitter and less emotionally draining. In aparties and trust in the process. Collaborative divorce
collaborative divorce, the parties seek to minimize thecreates an environment of process trust by requiring
amount of pain experienced by children and parentsfull disclosure and enforcing the parties obligation to do
by agreeing not to go to court and instead toso. A collaborative divorce lawyer must make full
participate in a series of negotiations to address alldisclosure, and correct and mistaken assumptions on
aspects of their divorce. The parties agree that allthe part of the other party. And the lawyer must insist
discussions and information provided remainsthat his or her client do so as well. In traditional litigation,
confidential The parties are not permitted to usea lawyers role is to advance the position of their client
threats of litigation, custody or otherwise.without regard to the interests of the family. This type
Collaborative divorce seems like a good concept inof "winner takes all" mentality may work well in a
theory but not in practice. When it comes to divorce,business context, but not in a divorce where the focus
there is often a lack of trust between the parties andis supposed to be on the best interest of the children.
a great deal of anger. Most couples seeking to divorceIn a collaborative divorce, lawyers work not as
have problems communicating with one another, whichopposing counsel but, instead, as members of a team
has often contributed to the decision to divorce. Itthat is committed to achieving the best result for both
seems hard to believe that two people who areparties and their children.
unable to communicate will be able to do during thisCollaborative divorce is not a fix all solution. Neither is
emotional and difficult period of their lives. Whenprotracted litigation over financial assets or a drawn
presented with this concept, many people respondout custody battle. The difference is that, with
that, if they could communicate, they wouldn't becollaborative divorce, parties can create an
getting divorced in the first place.environment that encourages them to move forward
At first glance, it seems unlikely that two people whoand which preserves financial resources and helps
can't get along will be able to discuss their divorce inprotect their children. Although trust between parties
such a calm and reasonable manner. But a growingmay have been lost, process trust can be created and
number of collaborative divorce practitioners,can help the parties move forward.
themselves disenchanted with the hostility-driven