Cost of Project Conflict

During my past 24 years of telecommunicationsdamage: $ 5,389
experiences, I have often wondered what the real#7: Restructuring around the problem: $ 10,778
agenda was of some corporate executives. A recent#8: Health costs: $ 450
conversation with a former colleague revealed a belief#9: Degraded decision quality: $ 112,090
that is widely accepted in his work environment butTOTAL COST of this conflict: $ 332,192
never openly talked about. This belief is that for someThis simulation assumes:o There are only 10 people
corporate executives, profits are not as important asare directly impacted in this project conflicto No cost
maintaining the status quo. According to him, thesefor impact to the Project Executive, IT Manager or
leaders believe that the appearance of 'being strong'Computer Technician due to the conflicto No additional
and 'in control' is more important than being responsiblecost to managers or executives outside of the
to the bottom line. If this is true, then it is oneprojecto There is no absenteeism due to the conflicto
explanation for why one would observe day-to-dayThe conflict only last 10 weeks (my former colleague
decision-making that results in poor companysited a conflict that's been ongoing for 78 weeks)o
performance.Each of the project members impacted by the conflict
This was in part the response my former colleagueonly loses 1 hour/week due to the conflicto Only a 5%
shared with me after I presented the opportunity thatreduction in project members' job motivation and
my project mediation service provides for removingloyalty resulting from the conflict
costly conflict from the work environment. He believesThis is the simplest simulation of project conflict. In
the corporate leaders in question thrive on conflict andreality, corporate executives are responsible for larger
use it to improve their position of power within theprojects and more than just one. Typically, more than
company structure. The perception is that conflict10 people are affected for more than one hour every
leads to blame, which triggers organizationalweek of a conflict. Project conflicts can easily be
restructuring, ultimately resulting in promotionresponsible for financial losses in the millions of dollars.
opportunities. After receiving this insight, I decided toLooking ahead, the opportunities in project mediation
evaluate the cost of 'appearing strong and in control'.are tremendous. Global competition has and will
This simulation uses the Dana Measure of Financialcontinue to create cost reduction pressure for
Cost of Conflict tool, designed by Dr. Daniel Dana,American companies. When companies are ready,
author of Managing Differences and founder ofthere is a solution available to assist them with picking
Mediation Training Institute International.a low hanging fruit that I refer to as project conflict. A
The simulation is a realistic situation for one (1) projectproject mediation or "decision-making" service can be
overseen by a corporate executive (Projectengaged to guide conflicting parties to an agreed
Executive). The leaders involved in this project are aresolution within 24 hours, avoiding further project
Project Manager, a Sr. Software Developer, andelays and reducing overall costs. This service can be
Operations Manager and an IT Manager. In additiondelivered anywhere in the United States for a relatively
there are two (2) Software Engineers working at thesmall cost ($5000). Now, assume that a mediation
direction of the Sr. Software Developer. A Customermeeting was scheduled during the 9th week of the
Service Representative, Installer, Specialist andsimulated conflict. A resolution was reached that
Electronics Technician are all working at the directionrequired an additional two weeks to implement, ending
of the Operations Manager. A Computer Technician isthe impact of the conflict after 11 weeks. The model
working at the direction of the IT Manager and annow calculates to cost of conflict to be:
Administrative Assistant is working on behalf of the#1: Wasted time: $ 4,149
entire project team. There are a total of 13 people,#2: Opportunity cost of wasted time: $ 6,224
including the Project Executive. The average#3: Lowered job motivation and productivity: $ 207
compensation used in this simulation is from PayScale,#4: Lost performance due to conflict-related
Inc. under United States Telecommunications, updatedabsenteeism: 0
July 18, 2008.#5: Loss of investment in skilled employees: 0
Assume that an unresolved conflict develops between#6: Conflict-incited theft, sabotage, vandalism, and
the Sr. Software Developer and the Operationsdamage: $ 5,928
Manager one month after the project start. This#7: Restructuring around the problem: 0
conflict is allowed to persist for 2 ½ months (10#8: Health costs: $ 495
weeks). The conflict is resolved when the Sr.#9: Degraded decision quality: $ 112,090
Software Developer leaves the project. Upon leaving,TOTAL COST of this conflict: $ 129,094
the individual is frustrated and communicates that hisThe simulated conflict resolved through project
skills have been requested on another project. Themediation ($134,094) yields a savings of at least
cost of this conflict as is as follows:$198,098 compared to the cost of doing nothing
#1: Wasted time: $ 3,772($332,1920). A proactive Project Executive who
#2: Opportunity cost of wasted time: $ 5,658schedules an earlier intervention would save an
#3: Lowered job motivation and productivity: $ 189additional $11,700 for every week the conflict interval is
#4: Lost performance due to conflict-relatedreduced. One day soon, we will not question the
absenteeism: 0agenda of any particular corporate leader. Business
#5: Loss of investment in skilled employees: $ 193,866profitability will be the agenda.
#6: Conflict-incited theft, sabotage, vandalism, and