Getting Divorced? You Have Options

Couples often find the preliminary stages of themediator, usually an attorney or a family therapist, to
divorce process overwhelming because of the manymeet with them. A mediator will conduct as many
issues they need to consider. Among these aresessions as necessary to help clients reach
questions about support, asset division, and children.agreement on their issues, without resorting to a
Reaching agreement on these issues is almost nevercourtroom. A mediator does not play the role of
easy, and couples are often besieged with advicearbitrator or decision-maker; rather he or she facilitates
from well meaning friends and family, and articles suchresolution. Mediation can be faster and far less costly
as this. The reason why this process can be sobecause couples only have to hire one individual to
bewildering is because each situation requires a uniqueresolve their issues. Mediation is most likely to be the
solution. Save the simplest cases, there are noprocess that enables parties to preserve relationships
standard resolutions. Thus, the guidelines of family lawand avoid the acrimony that can create years of hard
are intentionally flexible and lacking in clear guidancefeeling and damage children. Most mediators
and rules. In light of this, couples must first understandencourage clients to consult with experienced family
their choices when getting a divorce. These includelawyers as coaches during the process so that they
litigation, mediation, and collaborative law. Eachare fully informed as they make commitments.
approach has its advantages and its advocates. It isCollaborative Law
up to each couple to try to figure out what processA relatively new approach to divorce is collaborative
suits them best, rather than focusing on specificlaw. Its popularity is growing across the country as
solutions.both lawyers and clients are finding it useful in certain
Litigationcases. In a collaborative law case, each client selects
The traditional and most common approach for dealingan attorney who makes a commitment not to go to
with divorce is litigation. Each individual hires his or hercourt to resolve the case. Each lawyer actually agrees
own attorney who files the case in court and obtainsin writing that he or she will withdraw from the case if
court orders regarding custody, support and propertyit goes to court as a contested matter. This feature of
division. Most attorneys practicing family law will makecollaborative law was developed to meet the
an initial effort to amicably resolve the case, but ifperceived problem of lawyers churning cases for their
settlement is not reached quickly, the conventionalown benefit. By agreeing in advance not to take the
approach is to seek court involvement. There is a widecase if it goes to court, all questions about the
variance in style among family lawyers, and clientsattorney's motivation are resolved. In the collaborative
retaining counsel should have extended conversationslaw process, both parties hire the same appraisers, the
with their lawyers about their philosophy, experiencesame pension actuaries and thereby reduce
and customary practices. For example, there aregamesmanship and cost. Experienced collaborative
attorneys who will not negotiate until temporary courtlawyers report that by eliminating the threat of 'I'll see
orders are obtained from a court or until a case isyou in court,' the process of resolving differences can
prepared for trial. These lawyers view any interest inproceed in an orderly, creative and non destructive
early negotiation as a sign of weakness to beway. Although slightly more expensive than mediation,
exploited by the other side. While there are cases incollaborative law permits the parties to have
which this approach is the only appropriate one, formeaningful involvement of attorneys who can help
most people this method should be a last resort whenwith technical and creative solutions, without running the
other less aggressive approaches have been tried andrisk that the situation will degenerate into a war. Many
failed. Since aggressive litigation is the most costlyclients find that mediation without the active
process and the one most likely to create emotionalparticipation of personal attorneys, is a little threatening,
and financial pain, clients must be careful who they hireespecially in a situation where one of the parties has
to represent them and should be careful to maintainsuperior knowledge or negotiating skills.
control of their attorney. At the end of the case, theNo matter which one of these three legal options
lawyer moves on to the next case. The clients mustcouples choose, they have to be concerned with their
deal with the wreckage left behind.own personal well-being and that of their families.
MediationNobody likes the idea of divorce, but there is no
Mediation is the most well known alternative to litigation.reason why marriage has to become an expensive
Mediation encourages clients to hire a neutral, divorcecourtroom drama.