The Cost Of Project Conflict

During my past 24 years of telecommunicationsdamage: $ 5,389 
experiences, I have often wondered what the real#7: Restructuring around the problem: $ 10,778 
agenda was of some corporate executives. A recent#8: Health costs: $ 450 
conversation with a former colleague revealed a belief#9: Degraded decision quality: $ 112,090 
that is widely accepted in his work environment butTOTAL COST of this conflict: $ 332,192 
never openly talked about. This belief is that for someThis simulation assumes: 
corporate executives, profits are not as important as• There are only 10 people are directly impacted in
maintaining the status quo. According to him, thesethis project conflict 
leaders believe that the appearance of \'being strong\'• No cost for impact to the Project Executive, IT
and \'in control\' is more important than beingManager or Computer Technician due to the conflict 
responsible to the bottom line. If this is true, then it is• No additional cost to managers or executives
one explanation for why one would observeoutside of the project 
day-to-day decision-making that results in poor• There is no absenteeism due to the conflict 
company performance. • The conflict only last 10 weeks (my former
This was in part the response my former colleaguecolleague sited a conflict that\'s been ongoing for 78
shared with me after I presented the opportunity thatweeks) 
my project mediation service provides for removing• Each of the project members impacted by the
costly conflict from the work environment. He believesconflict only loses 1 hour/week due to the conflict 
the corporate leaders in question thrive on conflict and• Only a 5% reduction in project members\' job
use it to improve their position of power within themotivation and loyalty resulting from the conflict 
company structure. The perception is that conflictThis is the simplest simulation of project conflict. In
leads to blame, which triggers organizationalreality, corporate executives are responsible for larger
restructuring, ultimately resulting in promotionprojects and more than just one. Typically, more than
opportunities. After receiving this insight, I decided to10 people are affected for more than one hour every
evaluate the cost of \'appearing strong and inweek of a conflict. Project conflicts can easily be
control\'. responsible for financial losses in the millions of dollars. 
This simulation uses the Dana Measure of FinancialLooking ahead, the opportunities in project mediation
Cost of Conflict tool, designed by Dr. Daniel Dana,are tremendous. Global competition has and will
author of Managing Differences and founder ofcontinue to create cost reduction pressure for
Mediation Training Institute International. American companies. When companies are ready,
The simulation is a realistic situation for one (1) projectthere is a solution available to assist them with picking
overseen by a corporate executive (Projecta low hanging fruit that I refer to as project conflict. A
Executive). The leaders involved in this project are aproject mediation or \"decision-making\" service can be
Project Manager, a Sr. Software Developer, anengaged to guide conflicting parties to an agreed
Operations Manager and an IT Manager. In additionresolution within 24 hours, avoiding further project
there are two (2) Software Engineers working at thedelays and reducing overall costs. This service can be
direction of the Sr. Software Developer. A Customerdelivered anywhere in the United States for a relatively
Service Representative, Installer, Specialist andsmall cost ($5000). Now, assume that a mediation
Electronics Technician are all working at the directionmeeting was scheduled during the 9th week of the
of the Operations Manager. A Computer Technician issimulated conflict. A resolution was reached that
working at the direction of the IT Manager and anrequired an additional two weeks to implement, ending
Administrative Assistant is working on behalf of thethe impact of the conflict after 11 weeks. The model
entire project team. There are a total of 13 people,now calculates to cost of conflict to be: 
including the Project Executive. The average#1: Wasted time: $ 4,149 
compensation used in this simulation is from PayScale,#2: Opportunity cost of wasted time: $ 6,224 
Inc. under United States Telecommunications, updated#3: Lowered job motivation and productivity: $ 207 
July 18, 2008. #4: Lost performance due to conflict-related
Assume that an unresolved conflict develops betweenabsenteeism: 0 
the Sr. Software Developer and the Operations#5: Loss of investment in skilled employees: 0 
Manager one month after the project start. This#6: Conflict-incited theft, sabotage, vandalism, and
conflict is allowed to persist for 2 ½ months (10damage: $ 5,928 
weeks). The conflict is resolved when the Sr.#7: Restructuring around the problem: 0 
Software Developer leaves the project. Upon leaving,#8: Health costs: $ 495 
the individual is frustrated and communicates that his#9: Degraded decision quality: $ 112,090 
skills have been requested on another project. TheTOTAL COST of this conflict: $ 129,094 
cost of this conflict as is as follows: The simulated conflict resolved through project
#1: Wasted time: $ 3,772 mediation ($134,094) yields a savings of at least
#2: Opportunity cost of wasted time: $ 5,658 $198,098 compared to the cost of doing nothing
#3: Lowered job motivation and productivity: $ 189 ($332,1920). A proactive Project Executive who
#4: Lost performance due to conflict-relatedschedules an earlier intervention would save an
absenteeism: 0 additional $11,700 for every week the conflict interval is
#5: Loss of investment in skilled employees: $reduced. One day soon, we will not question the
193,866 agenda of any particular corporate leader. Business
#6: Conflict-incited theft, sabotage, vandalism, andprofitability will be the agenda.