Alternative ways to resolve a conflict


sdmediate.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

Los Angeles Sherrif Inmates Information Los Angeles County Sherrif's dept
mediation acid reflux apples
mediation jobs Online Mediation Jobs
WWW.Los Angeles county sherrif dept.com newsletter
LOS ANGELES COUNTY COURT SYSTEM Mediation Jobs
lawyer cid reflux apples
los angeles sherrif department information
los angeles sherrif San Diego Sherrif Inmate Log
+education mediators in nj natural cures for acid reflux
how paper towels are made los angeles shrruf
new jersey palimony laws SAN DIEGO INMATE SEARCH
Los Angeles Inmate Information www.los angeles inmate information
how to mediate a gang member cheap yoga in san diego

Lost In Translation: California Community Dispute Resolution Programs Denied Funding

In 1986, the California legislature enacted aviolation of legislative intent could hardly
statute to fund a Dispute Resolution Program.be clearer. Los Angeles County specifically
In enacting this statute the Legislaturelimits funding for Small Claims and ignores
recognized that the resolution of manythe statutory purpose of racial, ethnic or
disputes is unnecessarily costly, timesocioeconomic diversity. By diverting funds
consuming and complex when achieved throughto already well-funded unlimited jurisdiction
formal court proceedings. As a result, thecases, the County circumvents the statutory
legislature intended for the funds to bepurpose by failing adequately to provide
directed to the community to develop anfunding to programs for Small Claims and
informal resolution of disputes in alimited jurisdiction cases that involve
non-coercive dispute resolution forum,disputes "between neighbors, domestic
outside of the court system. The intent ofdisputes and consumer-merchant disputes,' as
the legislature has been lost and the fundsspecified  by  legislative  intent.
are being directed toward court programs that
favor the economically well off, specificallyThus, the programs intended by the
claims over $25,000, who have the financiallegislature to benefit from the funds, namely
resources to maintain costly and protractedcommunity programs involving disputes that
litigation. The Dispute Resolution Programhave not already entered the court system and
Act must be amended to restore thesimilar court-connected programs involving
legislature's intent that the funds be usedsocio-economically challenged persons
for Community programs for persons of allinvolved in low value limited jurisdiction
ethnic, racial and socioeconomic backgrounds.and Small Claims disputes, and Youth Peer
The Legislature states in Business andPrograms, are suffering because funds are
Professions Code section 465 that the purposebeing diverted to programs serving
of the program is to seek alternatives toeconomically prosperous, who receive dispute
costly legal process, by fundingresolution services free of charge while
community-based dispute resolution programspaying handsomely for all other aspects of
reflective of the diversity of thetheir  litigation.
communities to be served, funded partly by
public funding and partly by users of theseAn enumeration of specific matters that may
services on a sliding scale basis, butbe referred to government-funded programs
without  cost  to  indigents.will prevent misuse of funds and uphold the
statutory purpose. Business and Professions
However, some of the counties have lost sightCode section 467.2 outlining the county's
of the Legislature's intent and haveeligibility requirements for funding should
misdirected the funds away from under fundedbe revised as follows: (b) Provision of
community programs to the detriment of theneutral person, reflective of the diversity
diverse communities and theof the community in which they serve,
socio-economically challenged. Some countiesadequately trained in conflict resolution
have chosen instead to fund court-connectedtechniques as required by the rules.......
programs, particularly claims over $25,000(c) Provision of dispute resolution programs
that can generally only be accessed byon a sliding scale fee-paying basis, and
economically  sufficient  persons.without cost to indigents, with respect to
any disputes that have not yet entered the
For example, Los Angeles County ignores thecourt system, and limited jurisdiction and
legislative intent by giving priority tosmall  claims  cases.
unlimited jurisdiction civil claims (over
$25,000) by providing free servicesBy incorporating the Legislative intent of
indiscriminately to all comers provided theydiversity of community volunteers and
are already in the litigation system. The Losenumerating the specific disputes that can be
Angeles court connected program specificallyeligible for Dispute Resolution Funds, the
discriminates against Small Claims and lowLegislature will finally create what it
value 'limited jurisdiction' cases (underoriginally envisioned: a funded
$25,000 cases), by giving them the leastcommunity-based dispute resolution forum for
priority and fails altogether to provideall persons of all ethnic, racial and
services 'on a sliding scale basis'. Thesocioeconomic backgrounds.



1 A B C 38 39 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 55 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86