The Dramatic Life of the Murphy Case Ends With Personal Injury Damages Taxable

The dramatic life of the Murphy case came to a quietwhistleblower damages were taxable. The Court
end when the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear theadopted the IRS's baseless argument. The IRS urged
case which signaled the taxation of personal injurythe Court to treat damages to people differently from
damages.damages to property. The IRS contended that
The U.S. Appeals Court for the D.C. Circuit shockedcompensation awarded to a person for the loss of an
the tax world with its initial Murphy decision, in which itarm or a leg was not payment to make a person
ruled that damages awarded a whistleblower were"whole" but was payment obtained as part of a
not taxable under the Constitution. Murphy filed a"forced sale" In other words, if a person suffered a
complaint with the Department of Labor alleging thatmental breakdown after witnessing her/his child being
her former employer, the New York Air Nationalmurdered, payment for that mental breakdown was
Guard (NYANG), in violation of various whistle-blowertaxable - as the victim (according to the IRS) simply
statutes, had "blacklisted" her and provided unfavorablewas "forced" to sell his or her mental health, and
references to potential employers after she hadobtained "income" based on the forced sale theory.
complained to state authorities of environmentalIn a remarkable reversal of its prior decision, the Court
hazards on a NYANG airbase. The Secretary ofadopted this baseless argument. The Court held that
Labor determined the NYANG had unlawfully"Murphy's situation seems akin to an involuntary
discriminated and retaliated against Murphy. Murphyconversion of assets; she was forced to surrender
submitted evidence that she had suffered both mentalsome part of her mental health and reputation in return
and physical injuries as a result of the NYANG'sfor monetary damages." As a result of the U. S,
blacklisting her. Upon finding Murphy had also sufferedSupreme Court's rejection of Murphy's appeal, plaintiffs
from other "physical manifestations of stress" includingmust pay taxes on compensatory damages for
"anxiety attacks, shortness of breath, and dizziness,"emotional distress or loss of reputation, if those
the ALJ recommended compensatory damagesdamages are caused by employment discrimination or
totaling $70,000, of which $45,000 was for "emotionalretaliation. The court has reasoned that the original
distress or mental anguish," and $25,000 was forharm is not personal injury but is akin to the taking of
"injury to professional reputation" from having beenproperty and therefore is taxable. Plaintiff's attorneys
blacklisted. None of the award was for lost wages orcannot argue in an employment case that the
diminished earning capacity.settlement agreement should state that a portion of
Surprisingly, the three-judge U. S. Appeals Court for thedamages be considered 'personal injury or emotional
D. C. Circuit quietly withdrew its original decision anddistress' in order to escape the tax man. That
issued a more conventional ruling holding that theargument will no longer work with Big Brother IRS.