Alternative ways to resolve a conflict


Mediation overview

Mediation comprises an act of bringing twois sometimes used as an umbrella term that
states, sides or parties in a dispute closercovers all mediation and facilitative and
together toward agreement through alternativeadvisory dispute resolution processes.
dispute resolution (ADR), a dialogue in whichSometimes the terms mediation and
a (generally) neutral third party, theconciliation can be interchangeable but often
mediator, using appropriate techniques,it is not appropriate for this to occur. Both
assists two or more parties to help themprocesses are non determinative and they have
negotiate an agreement, with concretemany similarities. The main difference is
effects, on a matter of common interest. Morethat conciliators have some degree of expert
generally speaking, the term "mediation"knowledge of the content in the area that
covers any activity in which an impartialthey conciliating. A conciliator can make
third party (often a professional)suggestions for settlement terms and can also
facilitates an agreement on any matter in thegive advice on the subject matter which makes
common  interest  of  the  parties  involved.conciliation more of an advisory service. The
conciliator can use their role to actively
Mediation applies to different fields, withencourage the parties to come to a resolution
some common peculiar elements and somebut the conciliator is in no way
differences for each of its specialties. Thedeterminative. In some types of conciliations
main fields of mediation include commerce,the conciliator has a responsibility to
legal disputes and diplomacy, but forms ofprovide legal information so that any
mediation appear in other fields as well.agreement made can fit into the statutory
Mediation in marriage technically belongs inframework that is required in the area that
the category, although it has followed itsis subject to the conciliation. Mediation is
own peculiar history since the times ofpurely facilitative whereas conciliation is a
ancient Greeks: compare marriage counselling.mixture of an advisory dispute resolution
service and facilitation. The term mediation
History  of  dispute  mediationis used where the practitioner has no
advisory role, if the practitioner does have
The activity of mediation in itself appearedan advisory role then the term conciliation
in very ancient times. Historians presumeshould be used. Both mediation and
early cases in Phoenician commerce (butconciliation identify the disputed issues and
suppose its use in Babylon, too). Theuse options to endeavour to reach an
practice developed in Ancient Greece (whichagreement.
knew the non-marital mediator as a
proxenetas), then in Roman civilization,Franchise agreements signify an ongoing
(Roman law (starting from Justinian's Digestcommercial agreement between the contracting
of 530 - 533) recognised mediation. Theparties. The agreements that are usually
Romans called mediators by a variety ofentered into have elements of imbalance of
names, including internuncius, medium,bargaining power and business experience
intercessor, philantropus, interpolator,between the franchisee and franchisor; there
conciliator, interlocutor, interpres, andare also many external commercial pressures
finally  mediator.that the parties are faced with. The
franchising code of conduct is a mandatory
The Middle Ages regarded mediationcode under the TPA. All franchise agreements
differently, sometimes forbidding theare required to have a clause that requires
practice or restricting its use todispute resolution. Mediation in this field
centralized authorities. Some culturesis working because it can identify
regarded the mediator as a sacred figure,alternatives for the parties and then the
worthy of particular respect; and the roleparties can work together to solve the
partly overlapped with that of traditionaldispute. For this type of mediation there are
wise  men.more formal procedures such as who ever
wishes to initiate the mediation is required
Mediation  and  conciliationto advise the respondent in writing outlining
the nature of the dispute and they will then
There has been much debate on the distinctionhave three weeks to agree to a method of
between conciliation and mediation and thereresolving the dispute otherwise they may go
is still no universal agreement. Conciliationto mediation.



1 A B C 38 39 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 55 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86