Logical Methods for Testing the Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Prototypes

Perhaps the most famous test of artificial intelligence isuse of the axioms and theorems present in the brain.
the Turing test, elaborated in 1950. As part of hisBehaviorism sees every decision made by the mind as
argument Turing put forward the idea of an 'imitationthe choice of one alternative over another, where the
game', in which a human being and a computer wouldpreferred output is the response that has repeatedly
be interrogated under conditions where the interrogatorbeen followed by a reinforcing stimulus.We can see
would not know which was which, the communicationnow that a method that would test the effectiveness
being entirely by textual messages. Turing argued thatof such a machine would be entirely based on a
if the interrogator could not distinguish them bychosen interpretation of the mind. Moreover, not only
questioning, then it would be unreasonable not to callthe test should be based on this interpretation, but also
the computer intelligent.There are several ways ofthe whole way the machine is built. It is obvious that
interpreting and discussing the Turing test, which inthe Turing test is entirely based on functionalism
effect all lead to the discussing of some keybecause the way computers were built, especially in
philosophical views on the mind. Considering the mindthe beginning was based on functionalism.Nevertheless,
as an input-output device with the exterior world, thethe Turing test has been severely criticized, especially
four main metaphysical takes on the mind would haveby logicians. There has even been invented a
four different views of how the decision of choosingcounter-test, or experiment to prove its lack of validity.
an appropriate output to a given input is mediated. TheThis test, the Chinese Room Experiment, developed
dualistic view on the mind would see as responsible forby John Searle has the main quality that assumes the
this mediation the right conscious experiences, thepremises of the Turing test, namely that the human
mind-brain identity theory would name the rightmind works according to theory that it has built in.
neurophysiological mechanisms, functionalism the rightShortly, the test says that an English native speaker
procedures while the behaviorist would not identify any.that has no knowledge of Chinese, is locked in a room
Accordingly, these four views would view the mentaland given a set of instructions and then two batches
processes as phenomenological, neurophysiological,of Chinese writings.When the third one is given, he is
computational, while the behaviorist would see the mindable to correlate one set of formal symbols to another
as lacking any processes but just having qualitiesset of formal symbols and thus, using the rules, he is
resulted from behavioral dispositions.What these fourable to give back certain sorts of Chinese symbols
views state effectively about the way the mind workswith certain sorts of shapes in response to certain
can be explained in an easier way, as follows. Thesorts of shapes given him in the third batch. Thus, the
dualistic view implies a certain awareness of the self,person would be able to communicate in Chinese, and
of the past experiences and is probably the closest toconvince the interviewer of his abilities, without actually
imply a freedom of choice. The mind-brain identityknowing any word of Chinese. He produces the
sees the mind and the brain as a whole and as theanswers by manipulating uninterpreted formal symbols,
only defining element of humans. All the processes ofbut as far as the Chinese is concerned, he simply
thinking can be explained through chemical andbehaves like a computer; he performs computational
biological reactions. Functionalism is the closest to theoperations on formally specified elements. For the
Turing test and to the most basic way we perceivepurposes of Chinese, he is simply an instantiation of the
computers. It states that the mind acts as an axiomaticcomputer program.
system and all the outputs are given as results of the