Alternative ways to resolve a conflict


Understanding The Difference Between Mediation, Arbitration and Trial

Many who confront the legal system for thearbitrator's findings) however, there are
first time, voluntarily or involuntarily, areoften penalties imposed on the party
faced with having to decide the forum inrequesting the trial de novo if he or she
which their dispute will be resolved. In somedoes not achieve a better result in trial
instances, the forum in which a dispute willthan achieved in arbitration. Private
be resolved has been pre-selected by theorganizations like AAA, JAMS, Judicate West,
parties however, more often than not,and IVAMS similarly offer arbitration
litigants will make their forum selectionservices. The cost is similarly based on an
only after a dispute has actually arisen. Ithourly  rate  or  half  or  full-day  basis.
is therefore important to have an
understanding of the difference betweenIn advance of arbitration, with all sides
mediation, arbitration and trial and theusually represented by counsel because
benefits and drawbacks of each. Often times,arbitration is an adversarial proceeding, the
the forum selected will dictate how quicklyarbitrator will be provided briefs detailing
and  effectively  the  dispute  is  resolved.the positions, arguments and demands of each
side. The rules of evidence in arbitration
Mediation is a voluntary process wherein twoproceedings are quite liberal. As such,
or more parties to a dispute try to resolvedocuments and other writings that might be
their differences with the assistance of aexcluded from evidence in a trial will be
neutral, disinterested third party such as anreceived and considered in arbitration.
attorney or retired judge. In most instances,Arbitration will proceed in whatever fashion
the cost of the mediator is shared equallythe parties desire. This may mean evidence is
however, this is not always the case,introduced through the admission of exhibits
especially where one party has an interest inand by way of live or recorded testimony or
seeing the matter resolve and offers to paysimply by way of offer of proof (usually an
for the mediation in order to entice theattorney explaining what the evidence is).
other party to attend and partake. TheseThe proceeding is much more formal that a
days, there are numerous private mediationmediation and, as above, is adversarial in
centers including, but not limited to, atnature. Once all the evidence is received,
least in the Southern California area, AAA,the arbitrator will usually take the matter
JAMS, Judicate West, and IVAMS. The cost ofunder submission and render an opinion and/or
retaining a mediator to assist in resolvingissue an award shortly thereafter. This
your dispute will vary depending on suchopinion or award is final and may only, under
factors as the experience level of thevery limited circumstances, be challenged or
mediator, how busy he or she may be, theappealed.
nature of your dispute, the complexity of the
issues presented, and the number of involvedArbitration proceedings are usually
parties. Most private mediation centers billconsiderably shorter than a trial and will
for their mediator's time on an hourly basisoften be less expensive though that is not
however, others bill a flat fee for a half oralways the case. The major drawback to
full  day.arbitration is that you have trusted the
outcome of your case to a single trier of
Mediation is not, like arbitration or trial,fact giving up your right to a jury. This may
adversarial in nature. As such, parties to abe fine in some cases however, where passion
dispute can mediate their differences withoutand prejudice may play a role in how the case
counsel. Anything said during mediation isis decided, it may be advantageous to you,
inadmissible in court. Thus, it is notdepending on which side of the case you are
uncommon to see parties who partake in aon,  to  try  the  case  to a jury of twelve.
mediation sitting together in a conference
room and, with the assistance of theTrial is what we most frequently see on TV.
mediator, working toward identifying theIt is the subject of virtually every hit
contested issues and then brain storming tocrime drama of our time from "LA Law" to
resolve them. Mediation is a give and take"Boston Legal" to "Law & Order". In the
process where there is no declared winner andabsence of a plea agreement, trial is where
no declared loser. For mediation to bevirtually all criminal cases are adjudicated.
successful, each side must give up something.In the civil arena, trials are less frequent.
Mediation is non-binding unless the partiesIn fact, most, upward of 90%-95% of all
agree to be bound by whatever result islitigated civil disputes settle in advance of
achieved. Mediation is favored andtrial. Trial is risky as there is no way to
recommended in cases involving neighborlytell what a jury (should you chose to proceed
disputes, family disputes, or where partiesby way of jury trial) will do with a case.
to a lawsuit involving a claim for monetarySimple things such as demeanor, appearance,
damages believe that with the intervention ofaccent, etc. can have a dramatic effect on
a neutral third party, a settlement can behow a jury views a case. If there is anything
achieved. Mediation is often the easiest andcertain about a jury trial, it is the
most cost effective way to resolve disputes.uncertainty of the outcome. For that reason,
The major drawback to mediation is that if noat EISENBERG LAW GROUP we work hard to
resolution is achieved, the other side will,resolve disputes before trial. This is not to
by virtue of your disclosures in mediation,suggest that we at EISENBERG LAW GROUP avoid
have a better feel for what theories oror shy away from trial. Quite the opposite!
claims (and strengths and weaknesses thereof)Messrs. Day and Eisenberg have over 30-years
you  might  proffer  in  litigation.combined trial experience and a fabulously
successful track record for favorable
Arbitration differs little from a bench trialoutcomes. Trials however, are expensive and
(a trial in which the judge serves as triercarry with them not only the uncertainly
of fact as opposed to a jury fulfilling thatreferenced, but the risk of appeal which, at
role). Arbitration may be binding orpresent, can tie a matter up for 2 ½
non-binding. Binding arbitration is usuallyyears. In addition, trials can be long and
by agreement of the parties with eachdrawn out. Many judges only hold trial 3-days
expressing, in a writing, a willingness anda week which means a 5-day trial with jury
commitment to be bound by whatever decisionselection and deliberation can last 2-weeks
the arbitrator may reach. Non-bindingor more. For these reasons, we at EISENBERG
arbitration affords the losing party theLAW GROUP consider use of all available
opportunity to seek a trial de novo (a trialforums for resolving your dispute placing
on the merits without regard to theyour interests above all else.



1 A B C 38 39 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 55 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86